You are here

Mark Gaffney on neocon-Zionist 9/11 suspects…and how they did it

Broadcast here February 8th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT). For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast – and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air – become a subscriber today!

Mark Gaffney, author of Black 9/11: Money, Motive and Technology, joins us to discuss his new article:

9/11: A Wilderness of Mirrors and the Prince of Darkness

Mark, like so many other 9/11 researchers, is moving toward the emerging consensus: Neocon-Zionist fanatics more loyal to Greater Israel than to the USA engineered the 9/11 coup d’├ętat. His conclusion:

“On September 11, 2001 we Americans witnessed the calculated use of terror to traumatize our nation in order to impose a neoconservative political agenda that has been a disaster for the whole world, especially the Mideast. In 2016, all of this is clear, or should be with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. But any Americans who read the neoconservative policy papers in the 1990s, understood the extreme ideas that were being expressed, saw the future, and tried to warn the rest of us about what was coming, were no doubt either dismissed as kooks or smeared as anti-semitic.”

In this interview we also discuss some of the “how they did it” questions: Were the alleged hijackers even on the planes, what happened at the Pentagon, were any of the alleged phone calls from passengers and crews real, and so on.

4 Thoughts to “Mark Gaffney on neocon-Zionist 9/11 suspects…and how they did it”

  1. Anonymous

    This is a great talk. You won the "debate" with Mark Gaffney. It is good that you brought up the ATALS, Anti Terrorism Auto Land System that was patented by Boeing in Feb 2003, and under development by 9/11. You are right that the simplest explanation, with fewest room for error, was probably how 9/11 was done. Remote Control Take Over, with fake hijackers, is the simplest. The other "leaked" clues to plane switching, and "real" phone calls, plane speed, planes still in the air, etc. are designed to create debate, and delay the truth until the public stops caring about 9/11. We have Paul Zarembka's study, mentioned by Mark Gaffney, in the CAONE. (or )

  2. Anonymous

    AGAIN in this podcast : "…poor americans, they don't know 911 official story is a lie…poor americans they are lambs led to the slaughter…poor americans they are victims of the media lies…"

    Can you stop the Bullshit for a second ?.

    Any challenge to the status quo is always repugnant to the consenting well-adapted slave, so there is an unspoken agreement between the hypocrites and their handlers :

    "You lie to us, and we'll pretend that we believe you with all our strengh and acting skills. Hopefully you will leave us alone to roam on the plantation undisturbed (ie : tv shows, ball games, barbecues on holidays, cheap goods made in slave-shops all around the globe, dating and mind games…etc)."

    The hypocrites think that their silence and compliance will make the blood thirsty rulers have mercy on them, while in fact it does nothing but increases their contempt for such a submissive people. The more bricks are piled up on their backs, the more obedient and compliant they are.

  3. People who are unaware of the Majesty, Grandeur and Power of Allah, always perceive puny tyrants and parasitic bullies as powerful giants they ought to accomodate at all cost.

  4. Anonymous

    Perhaps you should have asked Mr. Gaffney where the landing gear, engine pods and other components of an airplane that are ALWAYS present at a crash site no matter how catastrophic. The same for Shanksville. That he dismisses the physics of the maximum speed a 767 can achieve at low altitudes is also curious. Just as no steel frame building has ever collapsed from fire before or since 9/11, so, too, has no plane ever evaporated after a crash.

    This conversation is an example of why this aspect of revealing the truth of 9/11 is so exasperating. A&E is correct by focusing on WTC7, a clearly recognizable controlled demolition. The movie Incontrovertible takes this tack and is the best chance to inform the public that 9/11 was planned.

    Bickering about the the planes is a distraction.

Leave a Comment