You are here

Remember the USS Liberty!

First hour: Retired US Army Intelligence Officer Timothy Smith joins us to discuss the Israeli massacre of the USS Liberty crew on June 8th, 1967 – a botched false-flag operation. The aim was to kill the entire crew, sink the ship, blame Egypt, and use “a helpful wave of indignation” whipped up by the Zionist media to bring the US into the war against Egypt. Tim is National Vice President for the Board of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee:  www.bordc.org

Second hour: Tod Fletcher, a close working colleague of David Ray Griffin, will discuss new evidence presented by the 9/11 Consensus Panel.

3 Thoughts to “Remember the USS Liberty!”

  1. Truth Jihad 06-08-2012

    (Note: I sent this letter to consensus911.org media contacts , Barrett, Zwicker, and Zarembka this morning 06-09-2012. I'm correcting some typos for this presentation.)

    http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-060812.mp3

    Mr. Fletcher, at around 65:00 you talk about examining others with careful scrutiny. These 2 statements beneath together are clearly double-talk:

    [QUOTING FROM HOME PAGE CONSENSUS911.ORG 12-05-2011]
    The purpose of the 9/11 Consensus Panel is to provide the world with a clear statement, based on expert independent opinion, of some of the best evidence opposing the official narrative about 9/11.
    [END QUOTE]
    http://www.consensus911.org/

    and

    [QUOTING WHAT IS BEST EVIDENCE PAGE CONSENSUS911.ORG 12-05-2011]
    The Panel uses the term in the very narrow sense of the “best evidence” available with regard to any specific claim of the 9/11 official story that the Panel challenges. It does not mean the strongest evidence against the official story in general. It is simply the best evidence against each particular claim that the Panel addresses.
    [END QUOTE]
    http://www.consensus911.org/what-is-best-evidence/

    There are a few reasons I can think of to use double-talk in this situation. None of them reflect positively on your effort, sir.

    Mr. Barrett, it's great to love people and support them and have hopes for them, but you must see the truth of their actions as well.

    And regarding this beneath:

    [QUOTING http://www.consensus911.org/media-contacts/ 06-09-2012]
    Specialty: Information Quality, Ethics, and Dynamics
    Name: Elizabeth Woodworth, Writer, Librarian; Canada
    Phone: 250-383-2417 (landline); 250-889-4559 (cell)
    Email: elizwood@shaw.ca
    [END QUOTE]

    Ms. Woodworth, ethics of what? What ethics?

    Paul
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dharma_combat

  2. Anonymous

    I worked with a person who was on the carrier group (I think it was the USS America but I can't remember for sure) that was in the area that was close to the USS Liberty attack. I believe the carrier's aircraft did not launch even though the had aircraft ready to launch, if you would like I could try to contact him I have his contact number. Interesting show today…

  3. Anonymous

    http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-060812.mp3

    Mr Fletcher, at around 65:00 you talk about examining others with careful scrutiny. These 2 statements beneath together are clearly double-talk:

    [QUOTING FROM HOME PAGE CONSENSUS911.ORG 12-05-2011]
    The purpose of the 9/11 Consensus Panel is to provide the world with a clear statement, based on expert independent opinion, of some of the best evidence opposing the official narrative about 9/11.
    [END QUOTE]
    http://www.consensus911.org/

    and

    [QUOTING WHAT IS BEST EVIDENCE PAGE CONSENSUS911.ORG 12-05-2011]
    The Panel uses the term in the very narrow sense of the “best evidence” available with regard to any specific claim of the 9/11 official story that the Panel challenges. It does not mean the strongest evidence against the official story in general. It is simply the best evidence against each particular claim that the Panel addresses.
    [END QUOTE]
    http://www.consensus911.org/what-is-best-evidence/

    There are a few reasons I can think of to use double-talk in this situation. None of them reflect positively on your effort, sir.

    Mr. Barrett, it's great to love people and support them and have hopes for them, but you must see the truth of their actions as well.

    And regarding this beneath:

    [QUOTING http://www.consensus911.org/media-contacts/ 06-09-2012]

    Specialty: Information Quality, Ethics, and Dynamics
    Name: Elizabeth Woodworth, Writer, Librarian; Canada
    Phone: 250-383-2417 (landline); 250-889-4559 (cell)
    Email: elizwood@shaw.ca
    [END QUOTE]

    Ms, Woodworth, ethics of what? What ethics?

    Paul
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dharma_combat

Leave a Comment