You are here

Joshua Blakeney critiques Toronto hearings, pushes 9/11 truth in university newspaper

Joshua Blakeney of the University of Lethbridge is well on his way to becoming the most important of the younger generation of 9/11 scholars. Joshua, who works with Professor Anthony Hall, won the Queen Elizabeth II Award for his research into 9/11 – and drew fire from the Mossad-glorifying anti-9/11-truth propagandist Jonathan Kay.

Like me, and unlike members of the 9/11 half-truth movement,* Joshua Blakeney is on a “truth jihad” – an all-out struggle or effort to get at and speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about the most important historical event of the 21st century.

Joshua just published a very stimulating critique of the Toronto 9/11 Hearings at Veterans Today, as well as a 9/11 truth broadside in the University of Lethbridge newspaper.  (Leave a comment supporting Joshua!)

He will be my guest on Truth Jihad Radio next Monday, September 26th, 1-2 pm Central.

* * *

* Half-truthers include:

– People who don’t want to talk about one or another aspect of 9/11 – Zionist involvement, the non-plane-crashes at the Pentagon and Shanksville, the impossible speed and/or flight paths of the planes in New York and Washington, etc. – because it would be “bad PR for the truth movement.”

– People who talk about controlled demolition of the WTC but not the obvious inside-job attack at the Pentagon.

– People who blame top US officials but not top Israeli officials and their Mossad.

– People who say they know the official story is false, but they don’t know who did it.

– People who admit US and/or Israelis were involved, but neglect or conceal the evidence that there were no hijackings or hijackers, and no Muslims involved; and that Bin Laden deplored 9/11 and suggested “American Jews” might be behind the attacks.

– People who obscure the evidence that there were no hijackings or hijackers by focusing on nothing but the WTC demolitions, and neglecting to point out that the fact of controlled demolition rules out human hijackings. (Humans couldn’t be trusted with 100% certainty to get control of the planes and hit the targets, providing cover for the demolitions.)

– People who admit that 9/11 was an inside job, but can’t let go of the Islamophobia that 9/11 instilled in the deepest recesses of their subconscious.

I don’t mean to heap vilification on these people. Half a truth is better than none! As long as these folks do what they do well, and don’t destructively attack others who are presenting broader aspects of  the truth, we should offer them encouragement as well as friendly, constructive critiques.

6 Thoughts to “Joshua Blakeney critiques Toronto hearings, pushes 9/11 truth in university newspaper”

  1. Anonymous

    Whats happening buddy?

    Hey, I am now the admin of the largest 9/11 truth group on FB and we want you to be apart of the group.

    Have a look and let me know what you think. 38,000 members and has potential for so many more.

    talk soon


  2. Mike Ruppert was partly right: controlled demolition debates turn into a long, drawn-out series of battles of competing experts. If you don't mention that no 757 hit the Pentagon, there were no hijackers and hijackings, no crash in Shanksville, etc. it makes it easier for the disinfo traitors promoting garbage like this:

    New Theory Explains Collapse of World Trade Center's Twin Towers

    ScienceDaily (Sep. 21, 2011) — According to a theory advanced by a SINTEF materials scientist, a mixture of water from sprinkler systems and molten aluminium from melted aircraft hulls created explosions that led to the collapse of the Twin Towers in Manhattan.

  3. I found this to be the most important part in this article:
    “I was hoping that these representatives of the “hard science” group would graciously concede that the properties of nanothermite have indeed been “oversold”, which would open investigation as to how the destruction of the Twin Towers was actually done—possibly including unconventional mechanisms such as mini-nukes or the censored directed-energy alternative”
    The biggest failure of these hearings was the censored directed-energy alternative. It is easy to see why this evidence was censored considering it was James Gourley who had most of the control about how these hearings would be handled. Their mandate to single out the most weighty evidence should have been phrased to single out nanothermite end of discussion.

  4. kevien where can we find the video screened before 911 is it already on the net.

  5. Anonymous

    Kevin, thank you for bringIng us this wonderful interview. I could listen to you and Joshua talking all day. Joshua is just energizing in all things 911. He's so clear and strong while having no ego to muddy his message. I really hope that the old 9/11 truthers take notice of his work.
    Keep up the great work Kevin and Joshua!!

  6. Anonymous

    Greetings, Joshua and Kevin,

    Congratulations to you both for being included on the editorial staff at Veterans Today.

    The great challenge in navigating 9/11 truth without being accused of being "anti-semitic" led those of us at to argue for hours over whether we could bring the message of 9/11 lies without saying "Jew" or whether we should just say "zionists". Additionally, we had decided that we would not mention the word "holocaust" because to do so is political suicide in an environment which punishes questioning the official narrative of "The Holocaust" even more fiercely than questioning 9/11 will bring scorn and rejection.

    It was our conclusion that we should stick to 9/11 matters alone. The battle of bringing up questions about "The Holocaust" was too steep a gradient and we had enough at our table to convince about a decade-old event, much less be distracted from 9/11 by accusations of being "Holocaust deniers". By separating 9/11 issues from the holocaust, we also felt we were doing a service to the 9/11 truth movement–keeping the movement from being tainted with "holocaust deniers" and distracting from the obvious facts of controlled demolitions, etc.

    Well, this newest art work by David Dees so appropriately sheds light on both subjects that I'm compelled to make David Dees' "light.jpg" go viral. Ahmadinejad shows the light of day on the deceivers and their generations-long scams to deceive and make wars by proxy.

    The only lessons of history we can learn from lies is that those who enforce their versions of history are able to prevent us from learning the lessons of history–and discovering who are the enemies of the human journey.

    As the Jewish-dominated mass media has been quite persistent in casting Ahmadinejad as a tyrant and "radical Islamist", any association with Ahmadinejad is dangerous–politically. How many have read Ahmadinejad's letter to the American people and understood his message? How many have read Ahmadinejad's letter to George W. Bush and appreciated how this leader of a smaller nation has great courage to speak truth to ruthless power?

    If Ahmadinejad's contentions were so far from reality, it should be a simple matter of being patient and putting the next speakers up to soundly refute Ahmadinejad's claims. The podium at the UN has hosted many controversial and difficult matters. The delegate seats have been occupied by those who are committed (supposedly) to processes of debate with an intention of understanding and world peace. Those who leave the forum have abandoned humanity for their own purposes to be forwarded–in the dark of night.

    David Dees' political art work tells us which countries are represented in the United Nations by people (I use the term loosely) who have loyalty to the zionist entity–not to the human journey. These "devils" have done us a favor in identifying themselves with the walk-out. Dees' collection includes quite a number of works which shed light on the evils of the zionist entity. His pictures, collectively, are worth at least six million words.

    I don't have the forum you two have achieved. Please use any of my composition above in ways you deem appropriate.

    Ed Kendrick

Leave a Comment