You are here

WTC Demolition Debate Continues: Bring on the Engineers!

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 11/13/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

My previous two shows featured physics professor Denis Rancourt and chemistry professor Niels Harrit offering opposing views about what destroyed the Twin Towers. But what do physicists and chemists know? ; – ) Today I’ll be talking to the real experts on how buildings stand and fall: engineers.

First hour: Tony Szamboti, author of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies paper “The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers” will be offering his critique of Tuesday’s Harrit-Rancourt debate and his reasons why the Towers must have been demolished with explosives. Tony Szamboti is a Mechanical Design Engineer with over 20 years experience in the Aerospace and Communications industries, responsible for designing a large variety of structures required to perform in dynamic environments. He is a member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Second hour: Dwain Deets, former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects. Dwain Deets has given powerpoint presentations on behalf of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth detailing the reasons why the three WTC skyscrapers must have been destroyed in controlled demolitions. He has spoken out on the extremely problematic speeds reported for the aircraft that struck the Twin Towers, calling this issue “the elephant in the living room.” He has also endorsed the research of Citizen Investigation Team showing that the government’s version of the Pentagon attack is a hoax, and that in all probability a large aircraft flew over the Pentagon at the moment of a carefully timed explosion. Deets’ endorsement of CIT, like that of Barrie Zwicker, was censored by the increasingly controversial 9/11 truth website 911blogger, leading Deets to participate in the development of a brand-new alternative 9/11 news site,

Dwain Deets’ background:

MS Physics, MS Eng
Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden
Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award
Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988)
Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics
Associate Fellow – American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Included in “Who’s Who in Science and Engineering” 1993 – 2000
Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems
– Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers
Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology
37 year NASA career

5 Thoughts to “WTC Demolition Debate Continues: Bring on the Engineers!”

  1. Anonymous

    All good to hear, but when will these 911 experts begin to discuss who dunnit? That being ISRAEL!!!???

  2. Anonymous

    No link to show yet.

  3. Anonymous

    Fixed. Page didn't upload correctly on Saturday.
    -Danny Romero, American Freedom Radio

  4. Dwain Deets is a pillar of fearless reason and moral integrity in the 9/11 truth movement.

    Deets's point was well taken that it would have been a needless complication for the 9-11 conspirators to risk a plane-load of panicked passengers on board the commercial airliners that were flown by remote control into the WTC twin towers and buzzed the Pentagon.

    The spectacular, tragic death of innocent airline passengers would serve the purposes of a terrorist public opinion influencing operation such as the 9-11-2001 state crime against democracy.

    How many innocent victims can be confirmed to have disappeared on 9-11 after having boarded one of the four ostensibly high-jacked airliners? Versus passengers whose connections raise the possibility that they subsequntly entered a "conspirators' identity protection program"?

    One plausible scenario puts the innocent passengers on the ground at an unscheduled landing at a military airport, where they could have been pressured to make the reported cellphone calls to family members, which served to heighten the tragic drama on 9-11 and falsely pointed to "muslim terrorists" as the perpetrators.

    After playing their assigned roles the innocent passengers could have received a bullet in the brain, or been flown by remote control over the Atlantic ocean and crashed at sea.

  5. This was a really great show, Kevin. Thank you. It was wonderful to hear from your two courageous and intelligent guests, who demonstrated, most eloquently, the honesty and common sense that will eventually carry the day for 9/11 truth awareness.

    You touched upon some very important points, I thought, in your critique of Rancourt's performance in the Great Demolition debate. I agree with you that it is necessary to bring this sort of discussion forward, not least so that we can sift through the various contestable interpretations of evidence, but perhaps more importantly, so as to illuminate the tactics and methodologies of the debunkers, the disinformers and the cover-uppers.

    We can well afford to challenge the sincerity and credibility of any who show disdain for reason, honesty and integrity. We should not underestimate the deviousness and disregard for fair play that is characteristic of our opponents, the opponents of truth and justice for 9/11.

    Most disturbing for me, is the apathy and cowardice of the overwhelming majority of middle class and professional types, the establishment lackeys described by Dwain Deets as "unwilling to go there" … I consider these types to be mere gullible minions, moral poltroons, incapable of independent thought, willing to turn a blind eye to the most heinous of crimes and provide succor for the worst of criminals … they willingly subsidize their own enslavement and unfairly foist calamities on us all.

    I hope we can rouse many more folk with the courage and concern for the common good so ably demonstrated by yourself and your guests.


Leave a Comment