Neocon pundit Charles Krauthammer has delivered a tremendous compliment to the 9/11 truth movement: “It’s beyond radicalism, beyond partisanship. It takes us into the realm of political psychosis, a malignant paranoia that, unlike the Marxist posturing, is not amusing. It’s dangerous.” (Full Krauthammer op-ed here).
The truth about 9/11 is indeed dangerous, not least of all to the neoconservative propagandists like Krauthammer who could one day find themselves in the docket for covering it up. The work of Mr. Krauthammer, and the other third-rate Goebbels epigones employed by the Zionists who “have a stranglehold” on the national media and the government (James Traficant) is treason pure and simple. It is also complicity in mass murder, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
This is the case because we now know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the three World Trade Center skyscrapers were destroyed in controlled demolitions using nanothermite composites–the most explosive substances yet invented–that were obviously not manufactured in a cave in Afghanistan. The tons of nanothermite used to destroy the World Trade Center could only have come from high tech military laboratories in the U.S. or Israel. Since Neils Harrit’s nanothermite paper was published, no journalist, including Mr. Krauthammer, has any excuse for putting out pro-official-story propaganda. Based on the Nuremburg precedent, Krauthammer could one day be charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity for publishing his anti-truth hit piece.
Just as nanothermite is the most explosive substance yet invented, 9/11 truth is the most explosive political substance yet invented. “Dangerous” is an understatement. It could trigger war crimes and treason trials (which could include journalist defendants like Krauthammer) that will make Nuremburg look like a Judge Judy misdemeanor case. And it has more than enough explosive power to bring down the Zio-American empire at free fall speed.
One Thought to “Krauthammer’s right, 9/11 truth IS dangerous”
Kev, you are such a hoot! Quoting Osama bin Laden and James Traficant as authorities! No triumphant report from NYC? It was that bad, huh? Did the Mossad agents give you a hard time?
Your "beyond a shadow of a doubt" confidence is not very scientific, since all the nano-thermite studies were conducted by 9/11 Truthers. We should wait for independent confirmation of their findings before investing too much of our credibility in the nano-thermite claims, in my humble opinion.
But there goes Kev, galloping off on his anti-crusade, recklessly promoting magicians' hero brags, and Pentagon flyover theories he hasn't bothered to check, and doing his damnedest to paint sober science as another gaudy carnival theory. "The most explosive substances yet invented"? Where did you get that information, Kevin? Did Willie Rodriguez tell you that? And you believed it?
Where do you get your information that nanothermite can only have been made in the USA or in Israel? What makes you an expert on secret weapons programs in Russia, China, India, Iran, Germany, the UK, Japan, Australia, or France? How do you know some sheikh with his billions didn't hire it done? What makes you so sure of yourself, Kevin? Does your confidence get you a lot of free drinks at the Dew Drop Inn?
(Why did you skip the Story Field conference in 2007? I'd think you would be anxious to share all the sciencey stuff you'd learned at the "What's Controversial, What's Not" shindig a couple of weeks before. Did you bag out because you knew I'd provoke you to make a total ass of yourself?)
Krauthammer is right–Truth is dangerous, and you're right, it's explosive. And you–dogmatic, excitable, bigoted, an uncritical non-thinker with a childlike mind who thinks he's got it all figured out–can not be trusted with such dangerous things.