In a comment on my recent critique of Chomsky I pointed out: There is actually a substantial peer-reviewed body of literature supporting 9/11 truth, including many books as well as dozens of articles. It isn’t “just a couple of articles by architects and engineers” (as Chomsky is still saying). By contrast, there is virtually no peer-reviewed literature at all defending the claim that the 9/11 Commission’s version is correct, or putting forth any evidence in support of this conclusion. Some anonymous coward – a troll named Omni-Putz who spends his life stalking and harassing 9/11 truth-tellers – responded: “Barrett’s facebook…
FULL ARTICLETag: dehaven smith
New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile
Is this building collapsing…or exploding? “The new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.” Read the full article: http://presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-vs-govt-dupes/
FULL ARTICLE