You are here

Professional Islamophobe Doug Giles, Islamic leader Zafar Bangash

Broadcast January 26th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on NoLiesRadio.org.
For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast – and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of TruthJihad.com and go to the “Private Blog” to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air – become a subscriber today!

First 15 minutes: Professional Islamophobe and journalistic bottom-feeder Doug Giles may not be a complete idiot – I agree with him on gun rights, family values, the holiness and sanctity of Jesus (peace upon him), and the superiority of 9/11-truther-coach Pete Carroll‘s go-for-touchdowns approach over  the Green Bay Packers’ settling for field goals. But Doug’s apparently not smart or brave enough to go toe-to-toe with me for the full twelve rounds. For a guy with such a testosterone-soaked website, he sure wimped out fast.

Doug’s website Clash Daily (think Fox News on PCP) is full of headlines like:  “AMERICAN SNIPERS: Protection From Islam’s Tyrannical Grip.” ” “MUSLIMS, DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS: Muslims Create Chaos In Texas Until These Bikers Showed Up.”  “A CHRISTIAN WITH COJONES: Rev. Graham: ‘This Country Was Not BUILT ON MUSLIM PRINCIPLES’.”

Sure, Doug, Rev. Graham may be a Christian with cojones, but how about you? This here patriotic American Muslim hereby challenges you to a full hour of no-holds-barred verbal crusade-jihad. Don’t be a pussy – come back on my show and defend your ridiculous BS as best you can!

Final 45 minutes: Noted Muslim thinker Zafar Bangash discusses what’s behind the media-orchestrated wave of Islamophobia washing over the world from Paris. Topics include the Bernard-Lewis-fabricated “clash of civilizations,” truth and lies about Islam, the Charlie Hebdo false flag, previous false flags including 9/11,  the Iranian Supreme Leader’s letter to Western young people, the reasons why the Zionist entity occupying Palestine is illegitimate, and the possibility that the Zionists plan to orchestrate another World War.

Zafar Bangash is Director of the Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought, and president of the Islamic Society of York Region, a suburb of Toronto.  His articles regularly appear regularly at Crescent-Online.net, the best Muslim current-affairs publication in English.
.

3 Thoughts to “Professional Islamophobe Doug Giles, Islamic leader Zafar Bangash”

  1. Anonymous

    Hello Sir,
    I created a script which lets me easily download different radio shows, most importantly yours. But unfortunately since the beginning of 2015 your archived-shows page on noliesradio doesn't include the short intro anymore (This show was broadcast on December 29, 2014. It is now archived here for everyone …). Could you mention it to your friends at noliesradio to get it fixed, please! I would really appreciate it. It's probably just a small issue in their script which I guess automates this stuff for them, since it started once the year changed. Thx and keep up the great work! I'm a long-time listener and always love to hear your view on things.

  2. Anonymous

    There's been years long speculation about Giles true sexual preferences. Might be useful discussing in any upcoming debate with him. http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2011/02/147-doug-giles.html

  3. Arm-chair conversational-failure analyst, here.

    I think you drove Giles off as if half consciously self-sabotaging. If he wanted something empirical, there'd be stuff easier to begin with–e.g., USS Liberty & Lavon Affair are pretty basic starting points. Any fool can get that we 'have' those. Like in the interview with Rebbeca and Tony ya'll were talking about those-tangible-moments that you mark as when you were enabled/motivated to catch on in the direction ya'll did, etc. So, what's the 'empirical' bit he mentioned sound like he knows he'd need? Actually seemed like he could be reasonable, but would never go to the extremes of e.g. anything that sounds like IT's ALL ff. Woulda been great to keep him going on how the degradation-of-morals seemed like it must have been something deliberate, especially if you added to it. …aren't there even some names to point to, there? I guess I'd have imagined that would've been easy to steer into your own …er…idiom.

    Sometimes it really is a loony discounting something because of exactly where it would rightly lead her. I've seen those. But sometimes it's just someone for whom what you say just doesn't seem, to him, to rightly go anywhere. I don't think Giles was so clearly the former at all. It may have been productive with a little patience?

    Another problem is that 'we' try to 'persuade' them of something. So, for 13 years they've really thought that their place-in-the-world is their betters kissing their butt just to get a nodd or two out of 'em. Probably need to put some accountability in their lap …thought experiments, traps to fall into, 'tests,' …etc.

    Amazing how cheap advice can be… …sorry about that.

Leave a Reply to persnipoles Cancel reply