You are here

“Vatican insider” Dr. Robert Moynihan; Jim Fetzer on “WTC was nuked”

Dr. Robert Moynihan (he’s the one not wearing a hat)
First hour: Dr. Robert Moynihan is the world’s top Vatican correspondent writing in English. He is the author of many books including

Pray for Me: The Life and Spiritual Vision of Pope Francis, First Pope from the Americas.

Dr. Moynihan’s unique brand of engagĂ© journalism is spiritually intense, unflinchingly personal, and refreshingly honest. Dr. Moynihan, unlike most mainstream journalists, is not afraid to mention the skeletons in the Vatican’s closet; he was a major source for my articles Was Pope Benedict fired by the Knights of Malta? and Vatican sex scandal shows the West has lost its way.

Dr. Robert Moynihan is founder and editor-in-chief of Inside the Vatican magazine. He is an American journalist with a knowledge of five languages and a seasoned Vatican analyst. He earned his B.A. in English, magna cum laude from Harvard and a M.A and Ph.D. in Medieval Studies from Yale. Robert’s thesis was The Influence of Joachim of Fiore on the Early Franciscans: A Study of the Commentary Super Hieremiam. Other research fields included: History of Christianity, Later Roman Empire and The Age of Chaucer.
Second hour: Dr. James Fetzer is a leading researcher on 9/11 and the JFK and Wellstone assassinations. He recently edited the much-read article Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11.
A former Marine Corps officer,  Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge,  computer science,  artificial intelligence,  cognitive science,  and evolution and mentality.

3 Thoughts to ““Vatican insider” Dr. Robert Moynihan; Jim Fetzer on “WTC was nuked””

  1. Looking forward to listening to the show, Dr Fetzer is one of the best out there.

    Dr. Steve Pieczenik was recently on Alex Jones show he was going off for about an hour:

  2. Moynihan not bad at all Kevin!

  3. Can you imagine my surprise when I heard my name mentioned by one of your callers, who claimed to believe the official story, regarding a comment I left on your TruthJihadRadio blog about mini-nukes.

    I've never heard anyone reference a comment on your blog before, seems quite strange that this caller would mention a comment I wrote back on Feb 25.

    Of course I immediately recognised the comment in question and I went back through your blog to find it. The comment raised a number of problems I have with the mini-nuke hypothesis.

    While I did indeed make a passing reference to Jim Fetzer in that comment, it was not my intention to cast aspersions against Jim. I greatly appreciate Fetzer's contribution to 9/11 research and the field of deep politics in general. I don't agree with everything he says but I respect his intellect and I don't doubt his sincerity.

    On the issue of mini-nukes at the WTC, I think Jim has gone out on a limb and committed himself to an untenable position, most likely due to personal animus between Jim and Steven Jones. I know Jim will be riled by this suggestion, but it's the only explanation I can think of for his otherwise inexplicable embrace of this absurd notion.

    I'll copy and paste part of my previous comment here, so Jim can address the issues I have with the mini-nukes proposition, if he wishes…

    For a start, there is a physical threshold to how small an atomic weapon can be made, determined by a quantity known as "critical mass".

    A nuclear explosion will release an enormous amount of visible light, a blinding flash not observed during the demolitions.

    Neutron emissions from a nuclear explosion activate surrounding materials which subsequently emit measurable quantities of radioactivity, also not observed at ground zero.

    Nuclear reactions produce a host of daughter nuclei fragments including well known and readily identifiable isotopes, that would have been present in measurable quantities throughout Lower Manhatten if nukes were used, yet none were detected.

    Nuclear detonations are point sources of energy radiating out in a spherical shock wave that would level everything in the vicinity, not stop conveniently at the boundary of the WTC complex.

    Above-ground nuclear explosions always produce a distinctive mushroom cloud, not witnessed at the WTC on 9/11.

    In closing, it seems to me the explosive demolition of the WTC skyscrapers is satisfactorily explained by the proven abundance of nano-thermite and probably other hi-tech explosives.

    I see no need for bizarre, speculative and unsubstantiated talk of mini-nukes and the like, but I don't expect Jim or Gordon will agree with me.

Leave a Comment